Get the full picture of how your future communities, airdrops, and followers will see your wallet.
Kings are legendary NFT holders, having distinguished themselves with a very long hold horizon, a willingness to participate broadly within NFTs, and a penchant for discovering quality.
Kings are the best holders on offer within the NFT community.
Queens are exceptional NFT holders, demonstrating a strong commitment to holding a diverse collection of NFTs.
Queens often have extremely high scores (similar to Kings), but fall short in a single area.
Knights are above average NFT holders with proven records of participation but potentially more polarizing histories.
Many knights are ex-NFT holders or never grew their collections beyond a few key communities, but are distinguished NFT participants nonetheless.
Others could rise up with just a few more purchases.
Blockchain provides us with a verifiable and proven history, but it is almost never used or referenced longitudinally. History is a potent tool for predicting behavior and outcomes. Blockchain projects should pay more attention to it when designing incentives and analyzing their user base.
However, by making it easier for projects to access and review wallet history and stats, they are more likely to do so.
While I own NFTs on many blockchains, none of these other chains have really reached a point of critical mass or saturation. Mainnet Ethereum has the largest, most diverse, and complete set of data on real NFT holders so it is the natural place to start.
The platform can adapt to other EVM-based chains if there is a compelling enough reason to add them.
Sign-in with Ethereum (SIWE) is a safe operation, but you really do need a bit of paranoia out here to survive long term. We're planning to use a Delegate.xyz-based solution to delegate login authority to another wallet.
A variety of factors are considered
If you have a Knight-tier or better wallet, here is a form you can fill out to suggest a collection to be added
Because there weren't too many lasting things happening in NFTs before 2021. Most wallets didn't exist then and there weren't really enough NFT projects to even meet our qualification criteria.
Multiple wallets aren't really in the spirit of building a unified on-chain reputation, unless there's something on-chain linking them all together. We have some ideas and will find a way to support it if enough people care.
Data analysis, generating reports, and granting access to our data on holders to interested parties.
No, but I do see the value in providing a simple way to query wallet reputation on-chain. A token contract might be a way to accomplish that.